Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34433 (KAR)

THE MANAGER v. ROSHAN V

WP/26710/2023 · 2025-09-04

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:44205 WP No. 26710 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 26710 OF 2023 (MV) BETWEEN: THE MANAGER, TATA AIG GENERAL INS. CO. LTD., NO 69, 3RD FLOOR, J.P.AND DEVI, JAMBUKESHWAR ARCADE, MILLERS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 052. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.N.KRISHNASWAMY., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. ROSHAN.V S/O VIJAY.B.SHETTY, MAJOR, 1/80, SHRI VENKATESHWARA NILAYA, KATHAVARA CROSS, BELVAI VILLAGE, BELUVAI, DAKSHINA KANNADA. 2. THE SECRETARY, INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN, OFFICE OF INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN, 19/19, JEEVAN SOUDHA BUILDING, GROUND FLOOR, 24TH MAIN, J.P.NAGAR, 1ST PHASE, BANGALORE-560 078. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:44205 WP No. 26710 of 2023 THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed before the Registrar (P & H) on 05.12.2023, on that day, three week's time was granted to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the matter was listed on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply the office objections. The petition was listed before the Court on 29.07.2024, on that day, a week's time was granted to rectify the office objections Despite granting time, the office objections are not complied with. The petition is listed today for orders regarding non compliance of office objections. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. As already noted above, despite granting time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the petitioner is not - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:44205 WP No. 26710 of 2023 interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21