Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34426 (MAD)

THIAGAPRABAGARAN.T v. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL

WP/8977/2025 · 2025-03-19

G Arul Murugan, R Subramanian

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.8977 of 2025 -------------------------- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.03.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.8977 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.10086 of 2025 Thiagaprabagaran. T ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Registrar General, Madras High Court, Chennai - 600 104. 2.The Registrar (Recruitment), Madras High Court, High Court Buildings, Chennai - 600 104. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India parying to issue a Writ of Mandamu, directing the respondents to initiate the process of re-valuation of teh petitioner's answer sheet of Law Paper I, with respect to the examination held on 05.08.2023 vide Notification No.34/2023, dated 01.03.2023 as far as the petitioner's Registration No.3420235301 is concerned based on the tabulation mentioned in para 15 of the present affidavit and consequently submit the re-valuation report before this Court. -------------------- Page No.: 1 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8977 of 2025 -------------------------- For Petitioner : Ms.K.Subashini for Chennai Law Associates For Respondents : Mr.B.Vijay, Standing Counsel ****** O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) The petitioner seeks a Mandamus for re-valuation of the descriptive answers in the Main Examination for selection of Civil Judge - Direct Recruitment for Puducherry Union Territory. 2. The notification issued by the High Court calling for applications makes it clear that no re-valuation or re-totalling of the marks in the Preliminary as well as the Main Examination will be entertained. Moreover, the valuation of the Main Examination was done by the District Judges and it is the discretion of the valuer to award marks. This Court sitting under Article 226 jurisdiction will not interfere with the discretion of the valuer/ examiner. A similar view has been expressed by the Division Bench of this Court in the order made in W.P.No.12671 of 2024 dated 20.06.2024. -------------------- Page No.: 2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8977 of 2025 -------------------------- 3. Hence, we see no merit in this Writ Petition. The Writ petition therefore fails and it is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (R.S.M.,J.) (G.A.M.,J.) 19.03.2025 dsa Index : No Neutral Citation : No Speaking order To 1.The Registrar General, Madras High Court, Chennai - 600 104. 2.The Registrar (Recruitment), Madras High Court, High Court Buildings, Chennai - 600 104. -------------------- Page No.: 3 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.8977 of 2025 -------------------------- R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. dsa W.P.No.8977 of 2025 -------------------- Page No.: 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis