Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3442 (KAR)

SRI.B. MOHAMMED SHARIEF v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/106413/2016 · 2025-02-06

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2322 WP No. 106413 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.106413 OF 2016 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI B. MOHAMMED SHARIEF S/O. LATE B. HUSSAIN SAB, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, OCC: RETIRED CIRCLE POLICE INSPECTOR, R/O: "KGN MANZIL", BEHIND KRISHNA TOURIST HOME, 28TH WARD, CHAPPARADAHALLI, HOSAPETE POST AND TALUK – 583 201, BALLARI DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SATHISH M. S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, D.C. OFFICE COMPOUND, BALLARI – 583 101. Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2322 WP No. 106413 of 2016 3. THE HOSAPETE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ISR ROAD, HOSAPETE – 583 201. BALLARI DISTRICT. 4. THE COMMISSIONER, HOSAPETE CITY MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, HOSAPETE-583201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI VEERESH R. BUDIHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R3; SRI SHIVARAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE WRIT IN THA NATURE OF MANDAMUS OF ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTION DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO DEMOLISH THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN SCHEDULE MENTIONED PROPERTIES OR PART THEREOF WITHOUT FOLLOWING THE DUE PROCEDURE OF LAW AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THERIEN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2322 WP No. 106413 of 2016 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings stand abated in the light of the petitioner being no more and no legal representatives to be brought on record for continuance of the cause. 2. Submission is placed on record. 3. Petition is disposed as having abated. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KGK/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69