SMT. KAMLESH KUMARI W/O SHRI BRAJ MOHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/2228/2024 · 2025-02-06
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34417 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34417 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5281] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 2228/2024
1. Smt. Kamlesh Kumari W/o Shri Braj Mohan, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Bambora, Tehsil Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.).
2. Kamal Gupta S/o Shri Braj Mohan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Gram Panchayat Bambora, Tehsil Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
2. Deputy Superintendent Of Police (Investigation Officer), Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Keshav Kumar Agrawal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 06/02/2025
1. The accused-petitioners have filed this criminal miscellaneous petition with the prayer for fair and impartial investigation of the criminal case bearing FIR No. 348/2024 registered at Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal, Tijara for the offences punishable under Section 3 & 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners after arguing at some length made a limited prayer that the petitioners have submitted a representation (Annexure-5) dated 08.08.2024 to the Investigating Officer but as learnt same has not been considered.
[2025:RJ-JP:5281] (2 of 2) [CRLW-2228/2024] Therefore, the Investigating Officer may be directed to consider the aforesaid representation and he may also be directed to make investigation on the issues raised in the representation.
3. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners, the Investigating Officer is
directed to consider the issues raised in the representation (Annexure-5), if the same has been submitted to him. The
consideration on representation be made strictly in accordance with law.
4. With the above observations, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J Mohita /31