IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2204 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.11.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Shambhu Prasad Sharma ……...Petitioner Versus HRTC and Another …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Sanjeev K. Suri, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) By way of instant execution petition, prayer has been made on behalf of the petitioner for execution and implementation of judgment dated 16.05.2025, passed by this Court in CWP No.7671 of 2025, whereby this Court passed the following order: “6. Consequently, in view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to pay due and admissible dearness relief to the petitioner in terms of above office memorandums within a period of six weeks from today. It is, however, made clear that in case due and admissible dearness relief is not paid by the respondents to the petitioner within the aforesaid period, then the same shall carry interest @ 5% per annum from the due date till its realization” 2. Since no action, whatsoever, came to be taken at the behest of the respondents pursuant to aforesaid direction, petitioner has approached this Court in the instant proceedings. 2 3. Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate, while putting in appearance on behalf of the respondents, states that though he has every reason to presume and believe that by now, order/judgment sought to be executed, must have been complied with in its totality, but if not, same would be definitely complied with within a period of two weeks from today. 4. Consequently, in view of fair stand adopted by the learned counsel representing the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep present petition alive and accordingly, same is disposed of with direction to the respondents to do the needful in terms of judgment sought to be executed, within a period of two weeks, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken towards the implementation of the order/judgment. November 11, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge