APHC010531232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [0] FRIDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 27157/2025 Between: 1. AIR CONTROL AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING CO LTD, HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 63, THE CHAMBERS, NR. GOYAL PALACE, OPP-GURUDWARA, S.G. HIGHWAY, BODAKDEV, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT - 380054. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SRI VISHAL DAGA. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110001 2. THE EASTERN NAVAL COMMAND, REPRESENTED BY THE FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING IN CHIEF 2ND FLOOR NAVAL BASE, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530014 3. FLEET MAINTENANCE UNIT, REP. BY THE OFFICER IN-CHARGE, C/O. FLEET MAIL OFFICE, NAVAL DOCKYARD VISHAKAPATNAM - 530014 4. THE INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, KALUPUR CIRCLE BRANCH, GROUND FLOOR, BSNL BUILDING, OPPOSITE KALUPUR RAILWAY STATION, KALUPUR, AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT - 380002 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 herein invoking the Performance Bank Guarantee vide PBG Number 000371124000026 dated 31.07.2024, as extended up to 15.10.2025, amounting to Rs. 19,00, 894/- (Rupees Nineteen Lakh Eight Hundred and Ninety Four only), vide Letter No. PC/303/H E/RAN A/24 dated 25.09.2025, alleging breach of terms and conditions under Work Order bearing No. PC/303/HE/RANA/24 dated 17.07.2024 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, contrary to the terms and conditions under Work Order bearing No. PC/303/H E/RAN A/24 dated 17.07.2024 and principles of natural justice, besides being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)g and 300A of the Constitution of India and/or pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased direct the Respondents No. 4 herein not to honor the Performance Bank Guarantee vide PBG Number 000371124000026 dated 31.07.2024, as extended up to 15.10.2025, amounting to Rs. 19,00,894/- (Rupees Nineteen Lakh Eight Hundred and Ninety Four only), pursuant to the Letter No. PC/303/H E/RAN A/24 dated 25.09.2025 issued by the Respondent No.3 herein and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K KOUTILYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 27157/2025 ORDER: The present writ petition is filed assailing the action of respondent No.3 invoking the Performance Bank Guarantee vide PBG number 000371124000026 dated 31.07.2024, which is extended upto 15.10.2025 to be arbitrary, illegal and violation of principles of natural justice. 2. The petitioner has entered into the contract with respondent No.3 on 17.07.2024. The same was awarded in pursuance to tender process initiated by respondent No.3. The total value of work awarded was for Rs.6,33,63,140/- as per the work order. The petitioner was supposed to complete the same within the period of six months. The petitioner was also required to furnish the performance bank guarantee for a value of Rs.19,00,894/- as condition precedent. The same has been complied by the petitioner on 31.07.2024 which is in force till 15.10.2025. In the process of execution of contract, respondent No.3 had issued impugned proceeding dated 25.09.2025 for encashment of Performance Bank Guarantee. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner tried to advance the arguments on merits of the matter. The contract provided for a specific dispute resolution mechanism of invoking arbitration, the petitioner had already issued notice dated 01.10.2025 invoking the arbitration clause under the contract. In as much as the disputes are agreed to be resolved through arbitration, under the provisions of Arbitration and conciliation Act, 1996, there is a specific remedy for securing interim measure by way of Section 9 application. The petitioner is therefore required to avail such remedy. 4. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 on instructions submitted that by notice dated 15.09.2025, the contract has been short closed and only thereafter, the Performance Bank Guarantee was sought to be encashed for delay in completion of the project. 5. Since, this Court is inclined to relegate the petitioner to prefer remedy of filing application under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, it is not proposing to examine the merits or otherwise of the respective contentions. In peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, considering that due to intervening vacations, the jurisdictional Court is not functioning, the writ petition is disposed of by granting petitioner liberty to avail appropriate remedy. The respondents are directed not to take any coercive steps in pursuance to the said proceedings for invocation of Bank Guarantee for a period of one week from today. In case the petitioner prefers appropriate application before competent Court, the same shall be considered and disposed of inaccordance with law without being influence by any of observations made herein. No costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed as infructuous. _______________________ CHALLA GUNARANJAN,J Dated: 03.10.2025 AG THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 27157/2025 Dated: 03.10.2025 AG