Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34410 (CHH)

SHRI RAKESH CHANDRAVANSHI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5557/2024 · 2025-01-29

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:5359 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5557 of 2024 • Shri Rakesh Chandravanshi S/o Shri B.R. Chandravanshi Aged About 39 Years R/o Dhan Mandi Road, Torwa Chowk, District Office, Chhattisgarh Rajya Beej Evam Krishi Vikas Nigam Limited, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Agriculture, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Chhattisgarh Rajya Beej Evam Krishi Vikas Nigam Limited, Through The Managing Director, H.Q. - Beej Bhawan, Ravigram, Telibandha, G.E. Road, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. The Chairman, Chhattisgarh Rajya Beej Evam Krishi Vikas Nigam Limited, H.Q. - Beej Bhawan, Ravigram, Telibandha, G.E. Road, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Faiz Kazi, Advocate For State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer For Respondents No. 2 and 3 : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 29/01/2025 1. Heard on I.A. No. 01 of 2024, which is an application for exemption from typed copy. Digitally signed by VAISHALI LUCKY NAGARIA Date: 2025.01.31 17:47:10 +0530 2 2. Looking to the fact that the instant petition become infructuous, I.A. No. 01 of 2024 is allowed. 3. Learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3 submits that the appeal filed by the petitioner was decided vide order dated 23.01.2025, as such the petitioner is required to challenge the order passed in the said appeal. 4. Upon this learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to prefer a fresh petition as this petition become infructuous. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact and taking note of the fact that the appeal filed by the petitioner is already decided, which is not under challenged as such instant petition is dismissed as become infructuous and petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the order of the appellate authority. 6. With the aforesaid observation(s)/direction(s), the instant petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) JUDGE vaishali