Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34407 (BOM)

VENKATRAO RAOSAHEB SHEJULE v. THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND OTHERS

WP/14390/2017 · 2025-07-02

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

121-WP-14390-17.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 121 WRIT PETITION NO. 14390 OF 2017 VENKATRAO RAOSAHEB SHEJULE VERSUS THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER AURANGABAD AND OTHERS ... Mr. Kawade Shrikant G, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, AGP for Respondents-State Mr. Gitte Mukund D. , Advocate for Respondent No.9 Mr. Patale Amol N, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4-8 .… CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 02.07.2025 PER COURT :- . Learned Advocate appearing for petitioner fairly submits that present writ petition has become infructuous due to lapse of time. 2. Hence, writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. [ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ] HRJadhav 1 of 1