APHC010530032022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32432/2022 Between: 1. KANTAMANENI SRINIVASA RAO, S/ORATNA BABU, AGED 51 YRS D.NO.4-46, RAMANAMMA CHERUVU DAVAJIGUDEM, GANNAVARAM , KRISHNA DISTRICT 2. KANTAMANENI SAROJA, W/O SRINIVASA RAO AGED 44 YRS,D.NO.4-46, RAMANAMMA CHERUVU DAVAJIGUDEM, GANNAVARAM , KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER GANNAVARAM POLICE STATION, GANNAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. ANNE SRINIVASA RAO, SON OF KONDALA RAO AGED 45 YRS PURUSHOTTAPATNAM, GANNAVARAM KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. GARAPATI RAVI KUMAR, SON OF VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO GANNAVARAM KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. GARAPATI VENKATA NAGESWARA RAO, GANNAVARAM KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Police 2 and 3 even though they are receipt of the Complaint from the petitioner given an acknowledgment dated 09-09-2021 kept quite even without conduct a preliminary enquiry nor registration of a F.I.R., as per the Judgment of Lalitha Kumari Case of Apex Court , keep on silence even without progress any thing all are Illegal, Unlawful , Violation of Principles of Narural Justice, Violation of Article 14,21 of the Constitutoin of India Consequently to direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to Register the Complainat of petitoner dt. 9-9- 2021 through an F.I.R., as per the Law and Proceure in the interest of the justice.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri R.Siva Sai Swaroop, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that they intend to withdraw the petition and hence the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.07.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.32432 of 2022 Dt.14.07.2025 Dinesh