Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34404 (KAR)

SRI. H. B. RAVI KUMAR v. SRI. HALESHAPPA. G. S.

CRL.RP/1517/2023 · 2025-04-26

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA AND SRI VIJAYA KUMAR MAJAGE, MEMBER CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.1517 OF 2023 (Lok Adalat No. 921/2025 ) BETWEEN: SRI. H.B. RAVI KUMAR S/O LATE SRI. BASAVARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/O KOGATHURU VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE DIST.-577 432. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. G.B. MARUTHI, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. HALESHAPPA .G.S S/O SRI. SHIVAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/O BASAVAPATNA VILLAGE CHANNAGIRI TALUK DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 551. ...RESPONDENT (BY Ms. NEENA JALAN, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S.B. SRIKANTH, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.R.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASID THE IMPUGNED ORDER - 2 - DATED 25.09.2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. DISRTICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANAGERE IN CRL.A.NO.21/2022 CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE DATED 15.03.2022 PASSED BY THE 1ST ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC CHANNAGIRI IN C.C.NO.504/2018 AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMIS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE COMPLAINT UNDER SEC.138 OF N.I.ACT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER 1. The petitioner - accused as well as the respondent – complainant are present. Both of them submit that the matter has been settled and the petitioner accused has undertaken to give a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- within a period of two months. 2. The respondent – accused is also agreeable to receive a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- in full and final settlement, provided the said sum is paid within two months, as undertaken by the petitioner – accused. 3. The respondent submits that if the said amount is not paid, as undertaken, a default clause may be indicated in the Joint Memo. - 3 - 4. The petitioner – accused agrees that if he is unable to pay a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- within two months, he would be liable to pay interest at the rate of 18% per annum from the date of the default. The matter is accordingly, settled. 5. It is agreed by both the parties that a sum of Rs.60,000/- is already in deposit before the Trial Court and the respondent – complainant may be permitted to withdraw the said amount. As a consequence, the petitioner – accused would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.1,90,000/- within a period of two months, as aforesaid. This Petition is, accordingly, disposed of, in terms of the Joint Memo. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER HNM