SMT. GEETIKA AGARWAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/9341/2025 · 2025-10-09
Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 9341 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Sri Sita Ram Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn as the petitioner wants to avail other alternative remedy available under law.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. October 10, 2025 Gaurav Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sita Ram Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Smt. Geetika Agarwal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad