AJEET KUMAR @ SITARAM SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./10164/2025 · 2025-11-25
Ambuj Nath
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34391 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34391 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:35124 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10164 of 2025
------ Ajeet Kumar @ Sitaram Saw, aged about 32 years, S/o. Tuleshwar Saw, R/o. Metkuri, P.O. & P.S.- Muffasil, Dist. Hazaribagh, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioner
-Versus - The State of Jharkhand
... … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH
------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate
------ 02/25.11.2025
Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 174/2025 arising out of Kasmar P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025, for the offences registered under Sections 103(1) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, subsequently cognizance has been taken under Sections 103(1) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 & 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned A.S.J.-I, Bermo at Tenughat.
3. On 12.01.2025, unknown criminals shot the son of the informant, namely Pintu Kumar Nayak, while he was sleeping inside his house. During course of investigation, co-accused persons were apprehended and murder weapon was recovered on their pointing out from the house of grandfather of co-accused Rahul Kashyap.
4. It was submitted that name of the petitioner has come in confession of co-accused persons. It was further submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court earlier.
5.
Learned counsel appearing for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that during the course of investigation, it has come in light that petitioner was continuously talking to the accused persons. It was further submitted that witnesses have stated in their statement that petitioner had threatened the deceased.
6. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am inclined to release the
petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-I, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with S.T. Case No. 174/2025 arising out of Kasmar P.S. Case No. 04 of
2025.
25 November 2025
(Ambuj Nath, J.) Rahul/-