- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4305 CRL.RP No. 1562 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1562 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI.G.V NARAYANA S/O ANNAIAH @ VENKATAHANUMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, GERUPALYA VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE - 560074. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RANGASWAMY M T, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE BY ACB POLICE STATION, RAMANGARA DISTRICT, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BANGALORE - 560001. 2. SRI MANJUNATH K M S/O K T MYLARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO. 938, 1ST MAIN, Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4305 CRL.RP No. 1562 of 2023 6TH ‘A’ CROSS, K S TOWN, KENGERI, BANGALORE CITY - 560074. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.RP US FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HONBLE IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU RURAL AT BENGALURU IN SPL.C.NO.569/2021 DATED 20.06.2023 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The counsel for the petitioner is absent. This Court vide order dated 22.01.2025 observed that inspite of notice was ordered to respondent No.2 in the month of July, 2024, PF not paid. However, in the ends of justice, again a week’s time was granted to furnish PF to issue notice to respondent No.2. 2. On perusal of the order sheet, it discloses that when the matter was listed before the Court for first time i.e., on 12.12.2023, the counsel for the petitioner was - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4305 CRL.RP No. 1562 of 2023 absent and thereafter the matter was listed before the Court on 26.07.2024 and on the said date also the counsel for the petitioner was absent and this Court ordered to issue emergent notice to respondent No.2 and directed the learned High Court Government Pleader to take notice for respondent No.1 and again the matter was listed before the Court on 22.01.2025 and on that day also, time was given to furnish PF to issue notice to respondent No.2. Inspite of sufficient opportunity was given to the counsel for the petitioner, he has paid PF till date. Hence, it discloses that after filing of this revision petition, the counsel has not taken any interest to prosecute the case diligently, thus, it appears that the counsel is not interested in the matter. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN