IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.17400 of 2025 Date of decision: 10th November, 2025 Nitasha Kumari. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Ms. Arushi Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. Kuldeep Chand Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1-State. Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for respondents No.2 & 3-HPSEBL. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) Ms. Arushi Chauhan, Advocate, appearing under instructions of Mr. Kuldeep Chand Thakur, Advocate, submits that due to ministerial mistake, which could not be rectified due to oversight, the petitioner intends to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes 2 2. Prayer is accepted and accordingly, petition along with application(s), if any, is dismissed with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action, as prayed. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge. (Romesh Verma) Judge. 10th November, 2025 (Pardeep)