- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3884 RFA No. 2236 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2236 OF 2023 (DEC/PAR) BETWEEN: SRI K.U.RAVI THAMMAIAH S/O LATE K.E.UTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING OPP. MUTHAPPA TEMPLE MADIKERI TOWN AND POST KODAGU DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI ARNAV A.BAGALWADI, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SMT. CHANDIRA PADMA RANI @ RANI CHENGAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS D/O LATE K.E.UTHAIAH W/O CHANDIRA P.CHENGAPPA R.O NO. 35/36, KAVERY NIVAS KALAPPA LAYOUT, 12TH CROSS RAJANNA COLONY, BASAVANAGAR BENGALURU. 2. SRI K.U.SOMMAIAH S/O LATE K.E.UTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O MUKKODLU VILLAGE AND POST PERMANENT RESIDENT AT Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3884 RFA No. 2236 of 2023 BLOCK NO. I OPP. MUTHAPPA TEMPLE MAHADEVPET ROAD, MADIKERI. 3. SRI K.U.GANAPATHY S/O LATE K.E.UTHAIAH AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O MUKKODLU VILLAGE AND POST PERMANENT RESIDENT AT BLOCK NO. I OPP. MUTHAPPA TEMPLE MAHADEVPET ROAD, MADIKERI. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the appeal was listed before the Court on 09.01.2025, on that day, finally a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal was ordered to be listed - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3884 RFA No. 2236 of 2023 under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections' on 28.01.2025 The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections'. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14