237 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA BODH RAJ SH. ANURAG VERMA IAS AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. R.K. Arya, Mr. Rohit Bansal, Sr. DAG, Punjab. HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case any fresh representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from today, the same shall be dealt with by the competent authority by passing a petitioner within a period of one week In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner within the In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands disposed of. Rule discharged. The parties shall remain bound by their respective undertakings. However, it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to abide with the aforesaid undertaking seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. 08.04.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: Versus SH. ANURAG VERMA IAS AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. R.K. Arya, Advocate for the Mr. Rohit Bansal, Sr. DAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case any fresh representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from today, the same shall be dealt with by the competent authority by passing a speaking order and the same shall petitioner within a period of one week thereafter In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appropriate application shall be submitted by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated period. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands disposed Rule discharged. The parties shall remain bound by their respective However, it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to the aforesaid undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1328-2025 Date of Decision: April 08, 2025 ........Petitioner SH. ANURAG VERMA IAS AND ANOTHER ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rohit Bansal, Sr. DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case any fresh representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from today, the same shall be dealt with by the competent authority speaking order and the same shall be conveyed to the thereafter. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner application shall be submitted by the aforesaid stipulated period. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands disposed The parties shall remain bound by their respective However, it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2025 025 Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case any fresh representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from today, the same shall be dealt with by the competent authority conveyed to the In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner application shall be submitted by the In view of the aforesaid, the present petition stands disposed The parties shall remain bound by their respective However, it is made clear that in case the respondents fail to the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.09 17:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document