[2025:RJ-JP:771] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15544/2024 Roshan Cheeta S/o Ramjan Cheeta, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Karni Nagar, Makadwali Road, Police Station Krisianganj, District Ajmer ( At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.347/2024 registered at Police Station Jawaja, District Beawar for the offences under Sections 109(1), 351(3) and 3(5) of BNS and 3/25 of Arms Act. During investigation, offences under Sections 109(1), 125, 217, 61(2) of BNS and 3/25 and 3/27 of Arms Act, have been found proved against the petitioner. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that this is a case of no injury. No one got injured in the alleged incident. It has come out during investigation that complainant himself was involved in the alleged [2025:RJ-JP:771] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15544/2024] incident of gunfire and he has been arrested. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 20.11.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that no recovery is to be made from the petitioner and there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that this is a case of no injury and no one got injured in this case; the petitioner has no criminal antecedent & trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner-Roshan Cheeta S/o Ramjan Cheeta, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:771] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15544/2024] 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and will not effect trial in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MR/309