2025:JHHC:32391 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 2511 of 2025 …. Ranjan Kumar Singh, aged about 38 years, son of Late Basudev Singh, Late Basudeo Singh, resident of Dandkhora, Railway Quarters, PO + PS- Dandkhora, District- Katihar (Bihar) …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sweety Kumari, aged about 30 years, wife of Ranjan Kumar Singh and daughter of Nand Kishore Singh, residing at Village- Okni Talab Road, PO- Hazaribagh, PS- Sadar, Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh … Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ----- For the petitioner : Mr. Vishesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar , APP For the O.P. No. 2 : None. ….. 03/17.10.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The instant Cr. M. P. No. 2511 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for restoration of Criminal Revision No. 232 of 2024, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the pre-emptory order dated 03.04.2025 passed by this Court. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that due to inadvertence on the part of the office, steps could not be taken for service of notice upon the opposite party no. 2. It is further submitted that due to communication gap, pre-emptory order dated 03.04.2025 passed by this Court could not be complied with. It is further submitted that the petitioner shall deposit Rs. 75,000/- in the name of the Opposite Party no. 2 by way of Demand Draft in the name of the opposite party no. 2 or cash in the office of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hazaribagh by 14.11.2025 and shall file affidavit along with receipt in the office depositing the said amount and 2025:JHHC:32391 -2- hence, Cr. M. P. No. 2511 of 2025 may be allowed and Criminal Revision No. 232 of 2024 may be restored to its original file. 4. Learned counsel for the State raised no objection. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and from going through the records and in view of the Undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner before this Court for depositing Rs. 75,000/- in the name of the Opposite Party no. 2 by way of Demand Draft in the name of the opposite party no. 2 or cash in the office of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hazaribagh by 14.11.2025, the present Cr. M. P. No. 2511 of 2025 is allowed. 6. Thus, this Criminal Revision No. 232 of 2024 is restored to its original file, subject to the condition that the petitioner will deposit Rs. 75,000/- in the name of the Opposite Party no. 2 by way of Demand Draft in the name of the opposite party no. 2 or cash in the office of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hazaribagh by 14.11.2025 and which shall be disbursed to the opposite party no. 2 by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Hazaribagh by informing her through DLSA and learned counsel for the petitioner shall also file receipt showing deposit of the same. 7. Office is directed to place this case before the Appropriate Bench as per roster, subject to payment of Rs. 75,000/- to the opposite party no. 2. (Sanjay Prasad, J.) Dated 17.10.2025 Kamlesh/