- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2492 RFA No. 2214 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2214 OF 2023 (INJ) BETWEEN: SMT. RENUKA D/O LATE P.VAJRAM, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO. 63, 2nd MAIN ROAD, 5th CROSS, NARASIPURA LAYOUT, VIDYAARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU-560 091. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. BALAJI PRASAD.H., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. KAMALAMMA W/O BALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO. 51, 6th MAIN, NARASIPURA LAYOUT, VIDYARANYAPURA POST, BENGALURU-560 097. …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Balaji Prasad.H., counsel for the appellant has appeared in person and submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply with the office objections. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2492 RFA No. 2214 of 2023 This Court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is simple. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and time was granted to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the appeal was listed before the Court on 10.01.2025, on that day, finally, two week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal was ordered to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections' on 21.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections'. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61