Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:4736-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceeding s or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSB 475/2016 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.
Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Vashistha, Brief Holder, for the State.
(2) Petitioners are serving as Assistant Prosecuting Officer. They claimed promotion to the next higher post of Prosecuting Officer. Their representation was rejected by Additional Secretary, Home Department vide
order dated 21.1.2016 on the ground that petitioners are not eligible for promotion as per the applicable rules. Thus feeling aggrieved by rejection of their claim for promotion, petitioners have approached this Court by filing this writ petition.
(3) Learned State Counsel submits that as per Rule 5(2) of Uttarakhand Prosecuting Officers Service Rules, 2015 an Assistant Prosecuting Officer, who has put in seven years of service as such on the first date of recruitment year alone shall be eligible for promotion to the post of Prosecuting Officer.
(4) Admittedly, petitioners had served only for three years at the time of making representation, therefore Additional Secretary was justified in rejecting the claim for promotion made by petitioners. Thus there is no force to the
2025:UHC:4736-DB challenge thrown to the rejection order. Writ petition thus fails and is dismissed.
(Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
10.06.2025 Pr
PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3a eab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052 DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.06.10 16:45:30 +05'30'