Vippala Venkata Seshi Reddy S/o Yellamanda Reddy v. The Municipal Corporation of Ongole
WP/2136/2014 · 2025-07-10
Nyapathy Vijay
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34368 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34368 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010529512014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY ^\\o TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 2136 OF 2014 Between: Vippala Venkata Seshi Reddy S/o Yellamanda Reddy, Aged 58 years, Occ: Cultivation, R/o.Guthikondavaripalem, Hamlet of Koppolu, Ongole Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The Municipal Corporation of Ongole, Prakasam District, Rep. by its Commissioner. 2. The District Collector, Prakasam District, Ongole. 3. The Secretary, Department of Urban Development, Government A.P., Hyderabad. 4. The A P Pollution Control Board, Hyderabad, rep. by its Member Secretary. 5. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary to Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. of ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS of any other writ, order or direction more in the nature of a Writ, declaring the action of the 1st dumping and burning the municipal solid waste collected in Ongole Town in respondent in
the lands in survey Nos.98, 99, 106, 100/1, 110 and 111 and in survey Nos.103 and 104 of Koppolu Revenue Village, Ongole Mandal, Prakasam District recorded, meant and being used as footpath/donka and river/eru in Revenue Records as arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction, contrary to the customary and easementary rights of the villagers for using the same for the purpose for which those lands are meant and further contraryto the provisions of Municipal Solid Waste Rules as well as the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and violative of the right of the citizens for clean environment of air, water, land and surroundings under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to use the land in survey Nos.98, 99, 106, 100/1, 110 and 111 and in survey Nos. 103 and 104 of Koppolu Revenue Village, Ongole Mandal, Prakasam District for either storing or disposing or as landfill site or transit/segregation point or compost yard of municipal solid waste.
lA NO: 1 OF 2014rWPMP 2597 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent not to use the land in survey Nos.98, 99, 106, 100/1, 110 and 111 and in survey Nos. 103 and 104 of Koppolu Revenue Village, Ongol Mandal, Prakasam District for either dumping or disposing of municipal solid wastes of Ongole Town pending disposal of this writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. VANGA ANITA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI B D MAHESWARA Counsel for the Respondent No.4: M/S. P RAJESWARI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 5:GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN REDDY DEV The Court made the following order:
APHC010529512014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 2136/2014 Between; ...PETITIONER Vippala Venkata Seshi Reddy S/o Yellamanda Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The Municipal Corporation Of Ongole and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VANGA ANITA Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.B D MAHESWARA REDDY 2.P RAJESWARI 3.GP FOR REVENUE 4.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following;
2 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 2136/2014 THE
ORDER: for hearing, learned counsel for the
1. When the matter is taken up Petitioner(s) seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Permission is accorded. withdrawn. There
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as shall be no order as to costs. miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand As a sequel dismissed as withdrawn. ■Officer Sd/-B assistant //TRUE COPY// I SECTION To, One CC to M/s. Vanga Anita Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri B D Maheswara Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to M/s. P Rajeswari Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CCs to GP for Muncipal Admn Urban Dev, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. TF
HIGH COURT DATED;1 1/07/2025
ORDER WP NO. 2136 OF 2014 O o •V:: yG- SEP 2Q?5 m; to ssrco™!"'’-