VIJAY KUMAR S/O SURJARAM v. TARAVATI WIFE OF BUDHARAM
CW/18785/2024 · 2025-01-16
Anil Kumar Upman, Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34366 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34366 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2181] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18785/2024 Vijay Kumar S/o Surjaram, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Dhani Hukma, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Taravati Wife Of Budharam, Resident Dhani Hukma, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu.
2. Mukesh Kumar S/o Budharam, Resident Dhani Hukma, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu.
3. Mahesh Kumar S/o Budharam, Resident Dhani Hukma, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu.
4. Land Holder Tehsil Buhana, Dist - Jhunjhunu.
5. Neelam Daughter Of Budharam, Resident Dhani Hukma, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu.
6. Sanju Daughter Of Budharam, Resident Dhani Hukma, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naveen Dhuwan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Order 16/01/2025
1. This petition is filed aggrieved of order dated 12.11.2024 passed by the Board of Revenue, Ajmer (for short ‘the Board’) granting interim protection while issuing notice in the revision petition.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time, is not pressing this petition with liberty to contest grant of interim protection before the Board as stay application is pending.
[2025:RJ-JP:2181] (2 of 2) [CW-18785/2024] Further liberty is sought to make a mention before the Board for early decision on the stay application.
3. The writ petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
4. There is no doubt in the eventuality of petitioner making a request before the Board for early decision on the stay application, same would be considered in accordance with law and sincere effort would be made to decide the application as expeditiously as possible in the facts of the case.
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Simple Kumawat /16