Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3436 (RAJ)

SARITA D/O VINOD KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/49/2025 · 2025-01-17

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2529] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 49/2025 1. Sarita D/o Vinod Kumar, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Ward No.10, Fenino Ki Dhani, Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 2. Pankaj Bhaskar S/o Mahendra Bhaskar, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No.15, Bhaskaro Ki Dhani, Katrathal, District Sikar, Rajasthan-332024. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. Superintendent Of Police, District Sikar. 4. S.h.o., Police Station Dadiya, Village Singasan, District Sikar. 5. Bajrang Son Of Jawan Ram, Residents Of Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan) 6. Vinod Son Of Jawan Ram, Residents Of Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan) 7. Balveer Son Of Jawan Ram, Residents Of Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan) 8. Jaiprakash Son Of Kishore, Resident Of Village Hardayalpura, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 9. Tulchhiram Son Of Rekharam, Resident Of Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 10. Raju Son Of Tulchhiram, Resident Of Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 11. Mahendra Son Of Tulchhiram, Resident Of Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 12. Mahendra Son Of Dungarmal, Resident Of Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 13. Shishram Son Of Bhagwanaram, Resident Of Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 14. Kamal Son Of Bhagwanaram, Resident Of Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan). [2025:RJ-JP:2529] (2 of 3) [CRLW-49/2025] 15. Praveen Son Of Mahendra, Resident Of Village Singasan, District Sikar (Rajasthan). 16. Satveer Son Of Bhagchand, Resident Of Togda, District Jhunjhunu. 17. Rakesh Son Of Bhagchand, Resident Of Togda, District Jhunjhunu. 18. Moharsingh Son Of Bhagchand, Resident Of Togda, District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Fouji Chawla, Adv. Mrs. Sarita with Mr. Pankaj Bhaskar (petitioners in person) For Respondents : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 17/01/2025 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Registry are waived. 2. Petitioners are present in person and they have been duly identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent(s) as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondent(s). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that both the petitioners are major and have solemnized marriage on their own free will. Copy of marriage certificate dated 26.12.2024 has been annexed with the writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but family members and relatives who are respondent Nos.5 to 18 are [2025:RJ-JP:2529] (3 of 3) [CRLW-49/2025] not happy with their marriage. It is further submitted that the petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, therefore, they should be protected. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Sikar and respondent No.2 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, and, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. The stay application also stands disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this order shall not prejudice/affect any other legal proceedings initiated between the parties. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /571