SANJEEV BANSAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/17423/2025 · 2026-09-08
Madan Pal Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3436 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3436 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 17423 of 2025 Court No. - 81 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J.
1. Sri Dilip Kumar Goswami, learned counsel appearing for opposite party no. 2, states that during the pendency of the present proceedings, the parties have amicably settled their dispute. A copy of the settlement agreement entered into between the parties has been placed on record. The aforesaid fact has not been denied by Sri Anurag Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant..
2. In view of the aforesaid settlement arrived at between the parties, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in the present application. Accordingly, the present application has been rendered infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 9, 2026 Akbar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Dilip Kumar Goswami, G.A., Narendra Singh (Madan Pal Singh,J.) Sanjeev Bansal And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKBAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad