BIKASH ROUT @ BIKASH CHANDRA RAUT v. STATE OF ODISHA
ABLAPL/5496/2025 · 2025-05-16
V Narasingh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34357 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34357 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.5496 of 2025
Bikash Rout @ Bikash Chandra Raut …. Petitioner
Mr. S. Dash, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. C.R. Swain, AGA
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
Order No.
ORDER 16.05.2025
02.
1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with C.T. Case No.878 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Chandikhole, arising out of Jenapur P.S. Case No.164 of 2025 for commission of offence punishable under Sections 109(1)/ 115(2)/ 126(2)/ 296/ 3(5) and section 351(2) of BNS.
3.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer.
4. Taking into account the nature of allegation, this Court is not inclined to entertain the ABLAPL. However, it is directed that Petitioner may surrender before the learned JMFC, Chandikhole in connection
with the aforementioned case within one month from today.
In the event of his surrender and motion for bail, the same be considered by the learned JMFC, Chandikhole on merits, in the first hour of the day.
In the event of rejection of the prayer for bail by the learned JMFC, Chandikhole, the Petitioner is at liberty to move the higher forum for bail in the second hour on the same day.
5. On being so moved, the higher forum is requested to make an endeavour to dispose of the bail application of the Petitioner on the same day. The case diary be made available to the concerned courts to facilitate disposal of the bail application of the Petitioner and learned JMFC, Chandikhole is called upon to transmit the case record to the higher forum at the earliest in the event of rejection of such bail application.
Ground of Parity, if any, may be considered by the learned court (s) below.
6. Learned Court in seisin is requested to verify the criminal antecedent of similar nature of the Petitioner. If it comes to the fore that the Petitioner has any such criminal antecedent, this order shall not be given effect to.
7. Accordingly, the ABLAPL stands disposed of.
8. U.C.C. as per rules.
(V. NARASINGH)
Judge Soumya Designation: Senior Senographer