Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34355 (KAR)

THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/25425/2023 · 2025-04-22

Krishna S Dixit, Ramachandra D Huddar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16428-DB WP No. 25425 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 25425 OF 2023 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA M.S. BUILDING DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JOSEPH ANTHONY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001 2. SRI. K.N. SATHYANARAYANA REDDY S/O. K.P. NARAYANA REDDY (LATE) AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER (RETD) KOLLUR VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI SRINIVASAPURA TALUK AND POST KOLAR DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. RAVINDRANATH, AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16428-DB WP No. 25425 of 2023 THE NATURE OF A WRIT THEREBY QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 18.09.2020 PASSED BY THE KSAT AT BENGALURU IN ANo-3816/2020 (ANNEXURE-A). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) The petitioner - Lokayuktha is knocking at the doors of Writ Court for assailing the State Administrative Tribunal's order dated 18.09.2020, whereby private respondent's Application No.3816/2020 having been favoured, the proceedings sought to be held against him have been voided because they are time-barred under Rule 214 (2)(b)(ii) of Karnataka Civil Service Rules. 2. Learned AGA, on request appearing for the first respondent, points out that the question involved in this case is no longer res integra inasmuch as, it has been completely answered by the Dharwad Bench of this Court in WP.No.104555/2022 between THE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA V/S. SRI. MADHAVA RAO S/O KRISHNA RAO, disposed off on 04.09.2024. In the said case, the Co- - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16428-DB WP No. 25425 of 2023 ordinate Bench declined indulgence against the relief granted to the delinquent employee who had demitted office on attaining the age of superannuation, cause being hopelessly time-barred as has happened in this case. Like cases should be decided alike, is the norm of administration of justice. In the above circumstances, the petition being devoid of merit is liable to be and accordingly, dismissed. Registry to send a copy of this order to the private respondent by speed post, immediately. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE AM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22