IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 102+217 CRM-16659-2025 IN/AND CRM-M-14336-2025(O&M) Date of Decision: 30.04.2025 NARESH KUMAR ....Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ....Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: Ms. Vandana Reeta Kohli, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner. Ms Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Dinesh Trehan, Advocate for the complainant. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) CRM-16659-2025 The instant application has been filed by the applicant/petitioner to implead the complainant Deepak Kathuria as respondent no.2 to the main petition. Learned State counsel who has advance notice of the application has no objection if the application is allowed. Accordingly, the same is allowed and the complainant-Deepak Kathuria is ordered to be impleaded as respondent no.2. Amended memo of parties has also been filed. Main Case Status report has been filed by respondent-State. The same is taken on record and be tagged at the appropriate place. Copy thereof has been supplied to opposite counsel. Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the complainant. The same is taken on record and be tagged at the appropriate place. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. ( MANISHA BATRA ) 30.04.2025 JUDGE Deepak Patwal 1. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No 2. Whether reportable Yes/No Deepak Patwal 2025.05.02 09:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document