APHCO10_529822012 lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESi+ AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JUL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANANP~ AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARnaA WRIT APPEAL NO-. 673OF2012 - rJ_lil writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated o4.03.2011 in WP.No.22422 of 2002 on the file of High Court.~ Between: 1. The Commissioner and Director of Collegiate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad 2. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Higher Education Department Secretariat, Hyderabad 3. The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Education, Kakinada/ Rajahmundry 4. The Principal, SRR & CVR College, Vijayawada. ...APPELLANTS ~ AND SGL Degree College, Lakshminagar, Cheruvu Madhavavaram, G.Konduru Mandal, Vijayawada, Krishna District, rep. by its Correspondent ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Ei ±>i**S` 2. Kagitha VijayalakshmI-, W/o.P.K.D.Prasad, Principal, SGL Degree College, Cheruvu Madhavavaram-521229 G.Konduru MandaI, Krishna District ...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT~ / ±An!Q_: 2 OF 2012(WAMP 1294 OF 2LQ±Z? - Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders dated 04.03.2011 in WP.No.22422 of 2002,pending disposal of the main appeal filed bythe Department. r Counsel for the Petitioners: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION r~ Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI N. ASHWANI KUMAR~ Counsel for the Respondent No.2: KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR ~ The Court made the following : JUDGMENT dtl`l THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRITAPPEAL No.673 of 2012 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Jus,lice Battu Devanand) Learned Government Pleader appearing for the appellants would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happenec] during pendency of the writ Appeal and the 2nd respondent was appointed as Principal in some other college and she also retired from service, nothing survives in this Writ Appeal for further adjudication. 2. Learned co'unsel for`Llhe respondents also endorsed the same. ht ,a,li q3. ln vievi'ofthe ab'6ve factual position, in our considered view, this writ Appeal can be dismis;ed as infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall Stand Closed. Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU sECT!ON OFFICER //TRUE COPY// Two CCs to GP for Higher Educat'lon, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] one cc to sri Kowturu Pavan Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] / one cc to sri N. Ashwani Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies HIGH COURT DATED:29/07/2025 JUDGMENT WA No. 673 OF 2012 DISMISSING THE WIA. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS