Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34345 (AP)

CHITTEM SIVAMMA v. SRI PIYUSH KUMAR

CC/4397/2024 · 2025-08-05

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010528572024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4397/2024 Between: 1. CHITTEM SIVAMMA, W/O. LATE ROSI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC. SENIOR CITIZEN, R/O.DOOR NO.8-3-174, ASHRAMAM STREET, BADVEL Y.S.R DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI PIYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, (C.F.M.S.,), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. G SRINIVASULU, SPECIAL COLLECTOR (LA.), G.N.S.S., KADAPA Y.S.R DISTRICT. 3. A CHANDRA MOHAN, SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA) TGP II, COLLECTORATE CAMPUS, Y.S.R. DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO The Court made the following: 2 ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri N. Rupeshwar Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri M.V. Krishna Rao, learned Counsel for the Respondents. 2. In compliance with the Order of this Court dated 09.07.2025, the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are present before the Court. 3. Insofar as Respondent No.1 is concerned, learned Counsel for the Respondents has moved an Application bearing I.A.No.1 of 2025 seeking dispensation on the ground that there is Cabinet Meeting today. Learned Counsel would also submit that the Order of this Court has been complied with. 4. Sri N. Rupeshwar Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, confirms the position that the Order of this Court has been complied with. 5. In this view of the matter, the appearance of Respondents is dispensed with and they are discharged from the Contempt. 6. This Contempt Case is closed accordingly. 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 06.08.2025 Vns