[2025:RJ-JP:14429] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15538/2024 Mansingh S/o Balram @ Bhuralal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Rai Police Station Chhipabarod Presently Resident Of Kelkheri Police Station Chhipabarod Dist. Baran (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Chhabra). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Bhatia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.455/2024 registered at Police Station Chhipabarod, District Baran for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110 & 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. Later on, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1) & 352 of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged incident took place in spur of the moment. Counsel submits that as a matter of fact, petitioner was residing in his in-laws house and he lost his temper as his in- [2025:RJ-JP:14429] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15538/2024] laws had started teasing him for residing with them. It is contended that charge-sheet has been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since 27.10.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that injury sustained by the injured person has been opined as dangerous to life thus, benefit of bail should not be granted to the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the material made available before me in the form of charge-sheet, so also considering the relationship between the petitioner & victim and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Mansingh S/o Balram @ Bhuralal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any [2025:RJ-JP:14429] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15538/2024] Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in second week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. The observations made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /69