HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 17030 of 2021 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant. However, Sri Rahul Srivastava, learned counsel for C.B.I. is present. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in R.C. No. 219 of 2017 E0017, under Sections 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of P.C. Act, Police Station C.B.I.E.O.-1 New Delhi with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial. 3. The instant anticipatory bail application is pending since the year 2021, therefore, it reflects, either applicant has lost the interest in the matter or by efflux of time, the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. 4. In view of above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed. 5. However, it is open for the applicant to file recall application if cause of action still survives. September 17, 2025 AK Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : J.P. Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Rahul Srivastava, Sanjay Kumar Yadav (Sameer Jain,J.) Amarendra Kumar .....Applicant(s) C.B.I. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad