Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34338 (AP)

K. Koteshwar Rao, v. Raja Babu

CC/5743/2023 · 2025-06-25

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010527852023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5743 OF 2023 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court be pleased to summon the respondent herein and punish him suitably for deliberate disobedience and willful violation of the orders of this Hon’ble Court passed in W.P.No. 22740 of 2023 dated 01.09.2023 Between: K. Koteshwar Rao,, S/o Gopalam, Aged about 47 years, Occ- Sarpanch, Lakshmipuram Grama Panchyat, R/o. Lakshmipuram Village, Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh may ...PETITIONER AND Raja Babu, The District Collector (Panchayat), Krishna District Machilipatnam. ...RESPONDENT :SRI THADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent :SRI KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following ORDER : Counsel for the Petitioner APHC010527852023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) as [3332] Q 'A THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 5743/2023 Between: K. Koteshwar Rao, ...PETITIONER AND Raja Babu ...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.THADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD Counsel for the Contemnor: 1.KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following: ORDER On 01.05.2025 and 08.05.2025, Sri Kiran Kumar Vadlamudi, learned counsel for respondent, reported compliance, however, as there was no representation for petitioner on both the occasions, the matter was posted this day to hear the learned counsel for the petitioner on the representation made by learned counsel for respondent regarding compliance of the orders. Today also there is no representation for petitioner. ► In view of the above, considering the representation made by learned counsel for respondent that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt Case, has been complied with, this Contempt Case can be closed. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K.TATARAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Raja Babu,^The District Collector (Panchayat), Krishna District, Macbilipatnam. One CC to Sri. Thadikonda Koteshwara Prasad Advocate [OPUC] One CC to gri. Kiran Kumar Vadlamudi Advocate [OPUC] Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. MKP TAC i HIGH COURT DATED:26/06/2025 ORDER CC 5743/2023 ff' .■K • 5( 2^ SEP 2025 O’i >4;affentSectjspXV$^ CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE