IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.20501 of 2025 Date of Decision: 29.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Sh. Charan Dass & Anr. …….Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent-State. Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 6. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petitioners would be content and satisfied in case directions are issued to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representations (Annexure P-2 colly) of the petitioners, in a time bound manner. 2. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, and Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate, while appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1 and respondents No. 2 to 6, fairly state that they are 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 not averse to the aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending representations (Annexure P-2 colly) of the petitioners expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and pass appropriate orders thereafter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 29, 2025 (Sunil)