APHC010528242022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 32176/2022 Between: 1. BHUPATHIRAJU KIRAN KUMAR RAJU, S/O.B.V.N.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O.FLAT NO.5A, MACHARLA APARTMENTS, STREET NO.6, UMA NAGAR, KUNDAN BAGH, HYDERABAD. 2. BHUPATHIRAJU KRISHNA KUMAR RAJU, S/O.B.V.N.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 50-117-17/9/3, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. BHUPATHIRAJU CHAITANYA VARMA, S/O.B.V.N.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.50-25-12, NARASIMHA NILAYAM, TPT COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. BHUPATHIRAJU VENKATA NARASIMHA SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O.LATE NARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O.FLAT NO.201, D.NO.66-67, SURYA RESIDENCY, MADHURA NAGAR, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, 2 VISAKHAPATNAM, A.P. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BHEEMUNIPATNAM DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 5. SMT KALLURI SAVITRI, W/O.BHAKTAVATSALAM, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O.17-8-8/5, TUPAKULA VEEDHI, M.R.COLLEGE ROAD, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Prohibition, against the 4th respondent prohibiting the said authority from proceeding to adjudicate the claim made by the 5th respondent under the provisions of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act, 1971, which has been set in motion by issuing general Notice, dt.15.09.2022 in Form-VIII under Ruie.19(1) of the statutory Rules, relating to the petitioners' land in Sy.No.45/2 and 45/3, an extent of Ac.1.57 cts of the 1st petitioner, an extent of Ac.1.55 cts of the 2nd Petitioner, an extent of Ac.0.42 1/2 cts of the 3rd petitioner and an extent of Ac.1.55 cts of the 4th petitioner, situated at Nerellavalasa Village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all and further proceedings pursuant to the general Notice, dt.15.09.2022, issued by the 4th Respondent in Form-VIII under Rule.19(1) of the A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Rules, 1989, in respect of the petitioners' land, an extent of Ac.1.57 Y2 cts of the 1st petitioner, an extent of Ac.1.55 cts of the 2nd Petitioner, an extent of Ac.0.42 I/2 cts of the 3rd petitioner and an extent of Ac.1.55 cts of the 4th petitioner, situated at Nerellavalasa Village, Bheemunipatnam Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the status quo order dated 29-09-2022 in WP.No.32176 of 2022 and also dismiss the writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to vacate the interim order dated 29/09/2022 passed in IA NO. 1 of 2022 in WP No. 32176 of 2022 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P ROY REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. N ASHWANI KUMAR 4 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, no cause survives in this matter. 2. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 31.07.2025 NNN