Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34335 (JHR)

SHIBU KEWAT ALIAS SHIVESHWAR KEWAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3613/2025 · 2025-05-05

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:13517] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3613 of 2025 ------ Shibu Kewat @ Shiveshwar Kewat, aged about 35 years, son of Late Kailash Kewat, resident of village- Mango (Kewatdih), P.O.- Tantri, P.S.- Balidih, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-05-05-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No.39 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed dacoity in the house of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has not been put under T.I. Parade as mentioned in para-9 of the bail application. It is then submitted that no stolen article has been seized from the house of the petitioner. It is also submitted that one hacksaw blade and two iron rods were recovered from the house of the petitioner and on that basis, he has been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.02.2025 as mentioned in para-17 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Bokaro in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No.39 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the informant or witness of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/