Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34335 (CHH)

MANOJ PATEL v. SMT. AASBAI YADAV

MAC/1665/2019 · 2025-06-26

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:28344 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1665 of 2019 1. Manoj Patel S/o - Shri Rupsingh Patel Aged About 52 Years R/o - Village Mudipar, Police Station And Tehsil Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh (Driver Of Offending Vehicle Cg 04-Db/5549) 2. Jaikumar Narmada S/o - Rupsingh Narmada Aged About 55 Years R/o - Village Mudipar, Police Station And Tehsil Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh (Owner Of Offending Vehicle Cg 04-Db/5549) --- Appellants/ non- applicants No. 1 & 2 versus 1. Smt. Aasbai Yadav W/o - Late Shri Mahendra Yadav Aged About 45 Years R/o - Village Mudipar, Police Station And Tehsil Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 2. Satanand Yadav S/o - Late Shri Mahendra Yadav Aged About 23 Years R/o - Village Mudipar, Police Station And Tehsil Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 3. Satyanand Yadav S/o - Late Shri Mahendra Yadav Aged About 25 Years R/o - Village Mudipar, Police Station And Tehsil Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ----Claimants 4. Bajaj Allianze General Insurance Company Limited, Through Its Branch Manager, Shiv Mohan Bhawan Road, Pandri Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of The Offending Vehicle Cg-04 Db / 5549), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents ____________________________________________________________ For Appellants : Mr. Rishi Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Prashant Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 27/06/2025 1. Learned counsel for appellants submits that as per his information, a compromise has been arrived between the parties and therefore he may be permitted to withdraw this appeal. 2. In view of above submission made by learned counsel for appellants, this appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge pwn