1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7985 of 2025 1 - Smt. Arti Jhariya D/o Shri D.P. Chandel, Aged About 36 Years Posted As Head Master Govt. Adiwasi Balak Ashram, Bairakh, Block- Bodla, District- Kabirdham C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Raipur C.G. 2 - District Education Officer, Kabirdham, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Anmol Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 12/08/2025 1. The limited submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner in the present writ petition that the petitioner made a representation to the respondent No.1 for her transfer from Kabirdham to Bilaspur on the ground of her personal difficulties. She made her representations on VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.08.13 19:13:17 +0530 2 25.09.2024 and 23.05.2025 (Annexure P/7), but till date her representations have not been considered. Therefore, the authorities concerned may be directed to take a decision on her representations dated 25.09.2024 and 23.05.2025 (Annexure P/7) within the stipulated time frame. 2. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has no objection, if such a direction is being made to the authorities concerned to take a decision on the pending representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within the stipulated time frame. 3. Considering the limited submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondent authorities to take a decision on the pending representations of the petitioner dated 25.09.2024 and 23.05.2025 (Annexure P/7), within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law, on its own merits. 4. The petitioner is directed to produce a copy of this order within two weeks from today to the respondent authorities. 5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved