HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15543/2024 Giriraj Jangid S/o Ramdhan Jangid, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village House No. 38A, Heerapura Dhawas, P.s. Karni Vihar, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Yadav For State For Complainant(s) : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rajendra Prasad Yadav HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.1213/2023 registered at Police Station Muhana, Jaipur City(South) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 384 and 120-B IPC. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed for offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel also submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody in this case since 05.11.2024. However, petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2024 in other cases lodged by same complainant. Counsel submits that all five cases have been registered against the petitioner on the basis of five different complaints submitted by the same complainant. (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15543/2024] Counsel submits that in three FIRs, bail has been granted to petitioner by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Trial will take time in its conclusion and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. Counsel submits that petitioner has five criminal antecedents of similar nature, therefore, bail should not be granted to petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; that petitioner is in custody since 05.11.2024 and trial will take time in its conclusion, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Giriraj Jangid S/o Ramdhan Jangid, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J HEENA/143