YASH PAL SHARMA v. UT OF J AND K THROUGH SHO POLICE STATION SATWARI AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/471/2025 · 2025-08-20
Rajesh Sekhri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3432 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3432 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 471/2025 CrlM No. 921/2025
202
Yash Pal Sharma
…..Petitioner(s)/Appellant (s)
Through: Mr. Jasbir Singh Jasrotia, Advocate.
q
vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sudershan Kumar, Advocate for R- 2 & 3.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 20.08.2025
1. Matter taken out of turn on request
2. Petitioner has invoked inherent jurisdiction of this Court for quashment of FIR No. 0007/2021 for offences under Sections 323, 354, 504 and 506 IPC on the ground of compromise with the private respondents no. 2 and 3, at whose instance, the impugned FIR came to be registered.
3. Compromise deed forms part of the record.
4. Statements of the petitioner, the complainant-respondent no. 2 and victim- respondent no. 3 have been reduced into writing before Registrar Judicial of this Court.
5. The complainant-respondent no. 2 and victim-respondent no. 3 have stated that they have entered into compromise with the petitioner and have no objection if the impugned FIR is quashed. Since parties have amicably settled the dispute out of Court, the present petition is allowed and the impugned FIR is quashed.
6. Petition stands disposed of along with connected CrlM(s).
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 20.08.2025 Abinash
73