SMT. SUREKHA W/O LATE SHRI VIJAY SINGH v. THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
CRES/1272/2024 · 2025-07-01
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34319 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34319 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24066] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 1272/2024 in in S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.2041/2019
1. Smt. Surekha W/o Late Shri Vijay Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Rampura, Tehsil Rajgarh, Police Station Hamirwas, District Churu (Rajasthan)
2. Smt. Vedkor W/o Shri Ran Singh Meghwal, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Rampura, Tehsil Rajgarh, Police Station Hamirwas, District Churu (Rajasthan)
3. Ran Singh Meghwal S/o Shri Mularam, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Rampura, Tehsil Rajgarh, Police Station Hamirwas, District Churu (Rajasthan)
4. Tanisha D/o Late Shri Vijay Singh, Aged About 8 Years, Through Her Natural Guardian Mother, Smt. Surekha W/o Late Shri Vijay Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Rampura, Tehsil Rajgarh, Police Station Hamirwas, District Churu (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus
1. The National Insurance Company Limited, Through Its Branch Manager, Upper Side Of State Bank Of India, Near Shaho Ka Kua, Station Road, Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan)
2. Puna Ram S/o Shri Pokarmal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Khejdi Ji Kalan, Police Station Luni, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan) (Driver Of Vehicle Tata Safari No. Up-14-Be- 6468)
3. Sourbh Sahrawat S/o Shri Ramveer Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o House No. R D C-43 Rajnagar, Police Station Kavi Nagar, District Gajiyabad (Up) (Owner Of Vehicle Tata Safari No. Up-14-Be-6468) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Soni For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
[2025:RJ-JP:24066] (2 of 2) [CRES-1272/2024] Order 01/07/2025 An application bearing No. 311/2025 has been filed by the applicant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 111 days in filing restoration application. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant and for the reasons mentioned in the application, this Court deems just and proper to condone the delay in filing restoration application. Accordingly application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay stands allowed. The restoration application has been filed by the appellant/applicant for restoration of the S.B. Civil Misc. restoration application No. 134/2024 which has been dismissed on 15.07.2024 in furtherance of peremptory order dated 03.04.2024 as the defects were not cured. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant/appellant and for the reasons mentioned in the restoration application, the same is allowed subject to payment of cost of Rs. 500/- with the Rajasthan High Court Munshi Sangh Jaipur Bench.
The applicant shall submit the receipt of the payment with the Registry. On submitting the receipt of the payment, the restoration application 134/2024 is ordered to be restored at its original number and position. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ANIL SHARMA /36