Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34315 (CHH)

CHUMUK LAL SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3300/2020 · 2025-08-07

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3300 of 2020 1 - Chumuk Lal Sahu S/o Late Shri Rathram Sahu Aged About 71 Years R/o Ward No. 2, Abdul Kalam Nagar, Sakri, P.S. Sakri, District- Bilspur, (C.G.), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Meena Sahu W/o Shri Chumuk Lal Sahu Aged About 67 Years Caste- Teli, R/o Ward No. 2, Abdul Kalam Nagar, Sakti, P.S.- Sakri, District- Bilaspur (C.G.), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Municipal Corporation Bilaspur Through Its Commissioner, Tehsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Shiv Kumar Gupta S/o Late Shri Lakhan Lal Gupta Aged About 60 Years R/o Ward No. 2, Abdul Kalam Nagar, Sakri, P.S.- Sakri, District- Bilaspur (C.G.), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Tehsildar Sakri District- Bilaspur (C.G.), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For State : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Panel Lawyer For respondent No.3/Municipal Corporation : Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Advocate For respondent No.4 : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Sharad Mishra, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 08.08.2025 REKHA SINGH -2- 1. Mr. Tiwari, the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.3 would submit that demolition notice was issued by respondent No.3/Municipal Corporation on 05.12.2020 and interim order is operating in favour of the petitioners from 08.01.2021, therefore, this petition may be disposed of reserving liberty in favour of respondent No.3 to issue fresh notice strictly in accordance with law, if occasion so arises. 2. Mr. Khan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would not dispute the contention made by Mr. Tiwari. 3. Considering the submissions made by the respective Advocates, this petition is disposed of at the admission stage. 4. Interim order granted earlier is hereby vacated. sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha