TARSEM LAL & ANOTHER v. RAHUL BHANDARI IAS & OTHERS
COCP/1337/2025 · 2025-07-09
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34313 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34313 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP No.1337 of 202
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 153
TARSEM LAL AND ANOTHER
Vs RAHUL BHANDARI
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ
Present: Mr. for the petitioner
Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Birinder Pal, Advocate
for respondent No.3. HARKESH MANUJA, J.
1. Learned State counsel on instructions from Dr. Raj Kumar, Assistant Director, Animal Husbandry, Punjab submits that upon revision of pay due to the petitioners shall be released within one week from today. 2. In petition is disposed of. the writ petition was disposed of by this Court on 04.09.2024 with a direction that the claim of the petitioners be considered w of certified copy of the order, however almost 10 months have gone by, yet the compliance is not done, in case the respondents fail to abide by the aforementioned undertaking within the stipulated period and 2 & 3 be attached Chandigarh and Deputy Commissioner, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) 2025 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.
Date of Decision:
TARSEM LAL AND ANOTHER
RAHUL BHANDARI AND OTHERS
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Birinder Pal, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel on instructions from Dr. Raj Kumar, Assistant Director, Animal Husbandry, Punjab submits that upon revision of pay due to the petitioners shall be released within one week from today. In view of aforesaid stand taken by the respondents petition is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. the writ petition was disposed of by this Court on 04.09.2024 with a direction that the claim of the petitioners be considered within 08 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order, however almost 10 months have gone by, yet the compliance is not done, in case the respondents fail to abide by the aforementioned within the stipulated period, the officia be attached with immediate effect Chandigarh and Deputy Commissioner, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1337 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2025
......Petitioners
....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA
Learned State counsel on instructions from Dr. Raj Kumar, Assistant Director, Animal Husbandry, Punjab submits that upon revision of pay, benefits due to the petitioners shall be released within one week from today. stand taken by the respondents, the present Rule stands discharged.
However, considering the fact that the writ petition was disposed of by this Court on 04.09.2024 with a direction that ithin 08 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order, however almost 10 months have gone by, yet the compliance is not done, in case the respondents fail to abide by the aforementioned the official vehicles of respondent Nos.1 with immediate effect by the Deputy Commissioner, Chandigarh and Deputy Commissioner, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali) respectively and a 1 Learned State counsel on instructions from Dr. Raj Kumar, Assistant benefits , the present However, considering the fact that the writ petition was disposed of by this Court on 04.09.2024 with a direction that ithin 08 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order, however almost 10 months have gone by, yet the compliance is not done, in case the respondents fail to abide by the aforementioned l vehicles of respondent Nos.1 Deputy Commissioner, respectively and a MOHMED ATIK 2025.07.10 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
COCP No.1337 of 202
report to this effect shall be furnished before this Court again list this matter for re
3.
It is also made cl the present contempt proceedings on account of non extended by the respondents, the sum of Rs.1,00,000/ litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application.
July 09, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2025 (O&M)
report to this effect shall be furnished before this Court again list this matter for re-hearing. It is also made clear that if the petitioners are made to seek revival of the present contempt proceedings on account of non extended by the respondents, the erring/concerned o 1,00,000/- to each petitioner as cost(s) from litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival
(HARKESH MANUJA)
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable
Yes/No
report to this effect shall be furnished before this Court and the Registry would if the petitioners are made to seek revival of the present contempt proceedings on account of non-compliance of the undertaking erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a as cost(s) from his/her own pocket towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival (HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No
2 would if the petitioners are made to seek revival of compliance of the undertaking fficer would be liable to pay a towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival MOHMED ATIK 2025.07.10 15:28 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment