PAWANA KUMARI AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
EX.P./2377/2025 · 2025-11-24
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34313 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34313 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. Petition No.2377 of 2025 in
CWP No.16550 of 2025
Decided on: 24.11.2025.
Pawana Kumari and another
… Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and another
… Respondents
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioners : Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional
Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral)
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that appropriate orders in terms of the judgment in issue shall positively be passed by the Authority concerned within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is taken on record.
2.
These proceedings are accordingly closed, with liberty to the petitioners to seek the revival thereof, if the needful is not done within a period of three weeks from today by the Authority concerned. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge November 24, 2025 (Vinod)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?