HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8160 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. This matter has been taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicants Sri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA for the State respondents. 3. This application under Section 482 CrPC has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of Case No. 652/9 of 2013 (State vs. Nadeem and others), registered as Case Crime No. 79 of 2013, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Kotwali City, District Muzaffar Nagar pending before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffar Nagar as well as the chargesheet dated 27.1.2013 as well as the cognizance order dated 8.2.2023. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant and the opposite party no. 2 have entered into compromise and the same has already been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding the same is on the record. It is also submitted that in view of the compromise arrived at between the applicant and opposite party no. 2, proceedings of the aforesaid case be quashed against the applicant. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 6. In view of the fact that the applicant and opposite party no. 2 have Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nadeem And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) entered into compromise and the said compromise has been verified by the learned Court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise is already on record and keeping in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed in respect of the applicant. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 7. In view of the aforesaid, the entire proceeding of Case No. 652/9 of 2013 (State vs. Nadeem and others), registered as Case Crime No. 79 of 2013, under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 IPC, P.S. Kotwali City, District Muzaffar Nagar pending before the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffar Nagar as well as the chargesheet dated 27.1.2013 as well as the cognizance order dated 8.2.2023 are hereby quashed. 8. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands allowed. September 24, 2025 Abhishek A482 No. 8160 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad