HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 554/2025 Amrita Roy D/o Awadhesh Kumar Roy W/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Sharma, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Village Kuni, Post Chausala, Tehsil Nawa, District Didwana-Kuchaman (Raj.) At Present Resident Of 203, Jagmohan Golden Fortune (Sdc), Bhawani Singh Road, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Medical Education Society Jaipur, (Raj Mes), Through Its Director Having Its Office At Govind Marg, Janta Colony, Chikitsa Shiksha Bhawan, Jaipur. 3. The Principal, Sms Medical College, Jaipur. 4. The Superintendent, Mahila Chikitsalaya, Sanganeri Gate, Jaipur. 5. The Government Medical College, Through Its Principal, Nagaur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/01/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was sanctioned maternity leave when she was rendering services at Mahila Chikitsalya, Sanganeri Gate, Jaipur, which was valid upto June, 2025. It is further submitted that petitioner delivered a baby on 05.01.2025. (2 of 3) [CW-554/2025] Further, it is submitted that thereafter petitioner was appointed for the post of Assistant Professor at Nagaur, where petitioner has applied for extension of maternity leave benefit before the new employer. However, the said extension was not granted to the petitioner. Therefore, being aggrieved of the same the petitioner has filed the present petition. Additionally, the petitioner has filed a representation before the competent authority-Director, Rajasthan Medical Education Society (Annexure-6), however the same is not considered. Lastly, learned counsel has placed reliance upon the judgment passed in DBSAW No. 376/2021 titled as State of Rajasthan and Ors. vs. Smt. Neeraj. Issue notices. On directions of the Court, Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondents. A copy of the petition is also supplied by the petitioner to the respondents Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC during the course of arguments. Learned counsel for the respondents has assured to adjudicate the representation filed by the petitioner (Annexure-6), looking to the facts and circumstances, strictly within a period of seven days. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, and considering the arguments put-forth by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court directs the competent authority/Director to adjudicate the representation filed by the petitioner (Annexure-6), in accordance with law, strictly within a period of seven days from (3 of 3) [CW-554/2025] the passing of this order. Howsoever, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum/Court, if still aggrieved. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J ANIL SHARMA/36