CRM-M-50800- IN THE H JANG SINGH STATE OF PUNJ 1 The dat 2 The dat 3 The dat website 4 Whethe pronoun pronoun 5 The del judgme CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. S Mr. A (throu MANISHA BATR 1. The Section 482 of Bh for grant of anticip -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH Versus PUNJAB he date when the judgment is reserved he date when the judgment is pronoun he date when the judgment is uploaded ebsite hether only operative part of the judg ronounced or whether the full judgmen ronounced he delay, if any, of the pronouncement dgment and reasons thereof. HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Tanvir Singh Attariwala, Advoca Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab Mr. Assem Sharma, Advocate for the (through video conferencing) **** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been prefe of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh anticipatory bail in case arising out of JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-50800-2025 (O&M) ... Petitioner ...Respondent served 20.03.2026 onounced 23.03.2026 loaded on the 23.03.2026 e judgment is dgment is Full cement of full Not applicable ANISHA BATRA dvocate for the petitioner for the complainant preferred by the petitioner under Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) out of FIR No.127 dated 20.08.2025 oner dent nder SS”) 2025 AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.23 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-50800- registered under S Singh, District Fat 2. The a complaint submit grandfather Basta favour of his 04 s Kanal 08 Marlas i brothers had filed whereby Uttami (w Ajmer Kaur (daug inheritance. The However, due to s revenue record an in connivance with fabricated Will pu got a mutation No was challenged by connivance with concerned, he pray 3. After and are underway for grant of antic Additional Session -2025 (O&M) 2 nder Sections 420, 465, 467, 468 of IP ict Fatehgarh Sahib. The aforementioned FIR was registe submitted by the complainant Am Basta Singh had executed a register is 04 sons thereby bequeathing his a arlas in equal shares to them. His fa filed a suit challenging the mutation tami (wife of Basta Singh and grandm ughter of Basta Singh) were also s The said suit was decreed in favour ue to some reason, the said decision co ord and taking advantage of the same ce with the co-accused, after the death ill purported to be issued by Uttami on No.482 sanctioned in his name on ged by the complainant by alleging tha with the scribe, attesting witnesse he prayed for taking action. After registration of FIR, investigati erway. After registration of FIR, investigati erway. Apprehending his arrest, the f anticipatory bail which was dismis essions Judge, Fatehgarh Sahib vide o 8 of IPC at Police Station Badali Ala registered on the basis of a written t Amrik Singh alleging that his egistered Will dated 18.08.1964 in his agricultural land measuring 75 His father Sher Singh as well as his tation of inheritance of Basta Singh randmother of the complainant) and also shown as co-sharers by way of avour of his father and his brothers. sion could not be implemented in the same, Jang Singh i.e. the petitioner death of Uttami prepared a false and ttami and on the basis of the same e on 09.08.2023. The said mutation ing that the petitioner had done so in itnesses and the Revenue Officer stigation proceedings were initiated st, the petitioner filed an application dismissed by the learned Court of vide order dated 28.08.2025. i Ala ritten his 4 in g 75 s his ingh ) and ay of hers. n the ioner e and same ation so in ficer iated ation rt of AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.23 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-50800- 4. It is a falsely implicated other than his rea Smt. Uttami (gran sound disposition the documents ar interrogation is no beneficiary of an offences are not at argued that a co Mediation Centre therefore, argued t 5. Learn objection to the a compromise effect 6. Learn allegations agains and proper invest master mind of th deserve to be allow 7. This C for the parties at co -2025 (O&M) 3 It is argued by learned counsel for t icated in this case at the instance of is real brother. The dispute between i (grandmother) has voluntarily exec sition of mind. The case is based on nts are already with the Investigat n is not required. No recovery is to be of any transaction. The ingredient not attracted qua him. He is ready to a compromise has been arrived a entre and he is ready to abide by the gued that the petition deserves to be al Learned counsel for the complainan the allowing of the petition, while effected between the parties. Learned State counsel, however, against the petition are serious in natu investigation, his custodial interrogat of the case. It is, therefore, stress e allowed. This Court has heard the rival submis es at considerable length. l for the petitioner that he has been ce of the complainant who is none etween the parties is of civil nature. executed Will in his favour with ed on documentary evidence and all estigating Agency. His custodial s to be effected from him. He is not redients for commission of subject ady to join investigation. It is further ved at between the parties in the by the terms of the settlement. It is, o be allowed. plainant has not raised any serious while affirming the factum of the ever, vehemently argued that the in nature. For conducting thorough rrogation is must since he was the , stressed that the petition does not ubmissions made by learned counsel been none ture. with d all odial s not bject rther the It is, rious f the the ough s the s not unsel AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.23 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-50800- 8. The p mutation purporte property in his fa petitioner has reli executed on 03.0 complainant party nature of the alleg peculiar to this c incarceration of th even otherwise be is allowed subject Investigating Offi and shall join inv when required and the satisfaction of with any evidence acquainted with t country, during permission from th and cellphone num terms and conditio 9. It is, be construed as an and shall not influ -2025 (O&M) 4 The petitioner is alleged to have pr urported to be issued by his mothe his favour. Civil litigation between as relied upon Annexure P9, which n 03.03.2026 between the petitione t party. The case is based on docum e allegations as levelled against the pe this case, this Court is of the con n of the petitioner is not required. Pre ise be a replica of post-conviction sen ubject to the condition that the petitio g Officer/Arresting Officer within a p in investigation within that period a ed and subject to his furnishing perso ion of the Investigating/Arresting Off idence, will not pressurize, induce, with the facts and circumstances of ring investigation and trial of the from the trial Court, shall disclose the ne number to the Investigating Officer onditions as envisaged under Section 4 It is, however, clarified that the obse d as an expression of opinion of this C t influence the outcome of the trial in a ave prepared a false and fabricated mother thereby bequeathing some tween the parties is going on. The which is a settlement agreement as titioner and the members of the documentary evidence. Given the the petitioner and the circumstances e considered opinion that pre-trial d. Pre-trial incarceration should not on sentencing. As such, the petition petitioner shall surrender before the hin a period of 15 days from today riod and also subsequently, as and personal as well as surety bonds to ng Officer. He will also not tamper duce, extend threats to any witness ces of the case, will not leave the of the case, except after seeking se the details of his Aadhar Card No. fficer and shall also abide by all the ction 482(2) of BNSS. e observations made above shall not this Court on the merits of the case ial in any manner. cated some The nt as the the nces trial d not tition e the oday and ds to mper tness the king No. the l not case AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.23 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-50800- 10. Since any, is rendered in 23.03.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 (O&M) 5 Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous. (MAN Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes Whether reportable:- Yes/No een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.23 15:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.