[2025:RJ-JP:9581] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15432/2024 Sanjay S/o Sh. Hajari Lal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Shanti Dham, Behind Budh Market, Anjaar Gandhi Dham, District Kachchh (Gujrat) (Accused/ Petitioner Is Confined In The Tonk Jail). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Atul Kumar Jain, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 04/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.171/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Tonk, District Tonk for the offences punishable under Sections 407, 409, 420 and 120B of IPC. Later on, Police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 407, 482, 483, 420 and 120B of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and after investigation, charge-sheet has been submitted by the Police. It is further submitted that entire stolen mustard oil has been recovered and same has been handed over to the complainant on [2025:RJ-JP:9581] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15432/2024] ‘supurdgi’. It is contended that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2024 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as six other criminal cases have been registered against him. Thus, benefit of bail should not be granted to him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Sanjay S/o Sh. Hajari Lal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve [2025:RJ-JP:9581] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15432/2024] in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/58