BHAGEERATHI MAHABALA PUJARI v. DURGA MACHA PUJARI @ DURGA
WP/29087/2024 · 2025-07-07
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34296 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34296 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24602 WP No. 29087 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 29087 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1(A). BHAGEERATHI MAHABALA PUJARI, W/O MAHABALA MACHA PUJARI, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
1(B). DIVAKAR MAHABALA PUJARI S/O MAHABALA MACHA PUJARI, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
1(C). VINAYAK MAHABALA PUwJARI S/O MAHABALA MACHA PUJARI, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
1(D). ANUSHA MAHABALA PUJARI D/O MAHABALA MACHA PUJARI, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
ALL DECREE HOLDERS RESIDING AT, HASANAGI BEDEHAKLU, YELLAPURA TALUK, UTTAR KANNADA DISTRICT - 581 347.
…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PARAMESHWAR N. HEGDE, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24602 WP No. 29087 of 2024
AND:
1.
DURGA MACHA PUJARI @ DURGA BIN ABBAKKA HENGSU, AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS,
2.
NAGA MACHA PUJARI @ DURGA BIN ABBAKKA HENGSU AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
3.
MUKAMBU MACHA PUJARI @ MUKAMBU BIN ABBAKKA HENGSU AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, ALL JUDGMENT RESIDING AT, MOODUGOPADY OF BUKKITLU, YEDTHERE VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 214. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 24.04.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT KUNDAPURA WHEREBY THE EXECUTION PETITION NO. 4/2021 WAS DISMISSED ASPER ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDES, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24602 WP No. 29087 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
ORAL ORDER
This Court on 09.06.2025 had passed a peremptory
order, which reads as follows:
"One week time is granted to comply with the office objections. In the event of non-compliance, petition would be dismissed for non-prosecution."
2. Even today, office objections are not complied with. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for its non-prosecution.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 125 CT:BHK