KOVVURI NARAYANA REDDY v. EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LITD AND 4 OTHERS
CMA/1130/2012 · 2025-07-17
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34296 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34296 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010527032012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1130/2012 Between:
1. KOVVURI NARAYANA REDDY, S/O VENKATA REDDY, AGED 60 YEARS, MALE, HINDU, BUSINESS, BRAHMNANANDAREDDY MARKET, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDEL WE GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT AND
1. EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LITD AND 4 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEAR GURUDWAR, VISHAKAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
2. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION, TOWN, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST :GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. THE ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEEROPERATION, SOUTH, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, D.P.E.-2 ELURU, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
5. ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ELECTRICITY REVENUE OFFICE, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI.
...RESPONDENT(S):
IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 2005 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 11 days in resubmitting the case Sr.NO.23402/2012 Counsel for the Appellant:
1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2. M RAVINDRA (SC FOR APEPDCL)
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.1130 of 2012
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that no further orders are required and the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording, the above submission, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
___________________________
JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.07.2025 M K K