Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34292 (PAT)

Vikash Kumar v. The State Bank of India

CWJC/6178/2024 · 2025-01-10

A Abhishek Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6178 of 2024 ====================================================== Vikash Kumar son of Upendra Rai, Resident of Panchwati Colony, Majhaulia Road, P.O.-Khabra, P.S.-Sadar, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Bank of India through the Chief Manager, Jonal Office Branch, Club Road, Mithnapur, Muzaffarpur. 2. The Assistant General Manager, State Bank of India, Region-1, Poddar Complex, Muzaffarpur. 3. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Branch situated at Red Cross Building, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mahesh Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 9 10-01-2025 Without going into the merits or demerits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the respondent Bank by way of representation ventilating his grievance within a period of four weeks from the date this order. On receipt of such representation the Bank authority shall pass necessary orders strictly in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereof. 2. It is needless to mention that before any order is passed, all the parties shall be put on notice and given an opportunity of hearing. 3. With the above said directions, the writ petition stand disposed off. Prakash/- (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) U